[ Test 01 ]
Mass through a session
Complete
Test piece → One piece, 2.00 g nominal, 1.99 g weighed · Test temperature → body temperature, chewed · Session length → 30 min continuous chewing · Checkpoints → 1 · 5 · 15 · 30 min, then dried 24 h · Force measurement → In progress — Test 02 (fixed-geometry compression, newtons) · Status → Internally tested · Method last updated → October 2026
Start
1.99 g
100%
1 min
1.69 g
85%
5 min
1.73 g
87%
15 min
1.67 g
84%
30 min
1.65 g
83%
Dried 24 h
1.63 g
81.5%
The measurable loss happens in the first minute, flavour and sweeteners dissolving. From minute 1 to minute 30 the piece moves by less than a tenth of a gram, and dried for 24 hours it still weighs 1.63 g: 81.5% of what you started with. Mass retention is evidence of structural stability, not a force measurement. Resistance, expressed in newtons, is Test 02, below.
[ Test 02 ]
Compression resistance over a session
In progress
Fixed-geometry compression · force in newtons at 0, 5, 15, 30 min · ONEJAW vs standard sugar-free gum · EXTERNALLY tested
Results to be published here.
This is the test that lets us put a number on 'calibrated': how much force the piece pushes back with when fresh, and how much of that force survives 30 min.
[ Test 03 ]
Comparative mass loss at 5 minutes, hard gum category
Complete
5 min of continuous chewing · weighed straight from the mouth, no blotting · precision balance, 0.001 g, calibrated and zeroed · a fresh piece per replicate, 3 replicates per gum, averaged · 4 competitor hard gums, names withheld · internally tested
ONEJAW
−0.26 g
13.0%
Brand A
−0.52 g
24.9%
Brand B
−1.11 g
41.4%
Brand C
−1.23 g
42.2%
Brand D
−1.15 g
42.7%
ONEJAW lost 13% of its mass in five minutes. The hard-gum field lost 38%, about 2.9× more. One hard gum came within reach at 25%; the other three lost more than 40%. Read with Test 05: at five minutes a piece is still taking on saliva, so the dried weights are the cleaner measure.
[ Test 04 ]
Comparative mass loss at 5 minutes, regular gum category
Complete
5 min of continuous chewing · weighed straight from the mouth, no blotting · precision balance, 0.001 g, calibrated and zeroed · a fresh piece per replicate, 3 replicates per gum, averaged · 3 regular soft gums, names withheld · internally tested
ONEJAW
−0.26 g
13.0%
Brand E
−0.83 g
60.0%
Brand F
−0.76 g
54.7%
Brand G
−0.91 g
58.7%
Regular soft gums lost 58% of their mass in five minutes, the field average of three brands, against 13% for ONEJAW: about 4.4× less. The gap is structural, not a defect: soft gum is built to deliver flavour, and flavour is mass that leaves. After five minutes what remains is a small pellet with nothing left to chew against.
[ Test 05 ]
Mass over 30 minutes, and what is left when dry
Complete
30 min of continuous chewing · weighed at 1, 5, 15 and 30 min straight from the mouth, no blotting · precision balance, 0.001 g, calibrated and zeroed · every gum dried 24 h at room temperature and weighed again · a fresh piece per replicate, 3 replicates per gum, one chewer per gum, averaged · 4 hard and 3 regular gums, names withheld · internally tested
Start, g30 min wet, gDry 24 h, gLost
ONEJAW1.991.651.63
18.5%
Brand A2.071.641.61
22.3%
Brand B2.681.381.36
49.1%
Brand C2.931.301.27
56.6%
Brand D2.691.371.33
50.6%
Brand E1.390.510.47
66.5%
Brand F1.390.540.51
63.1%
Brand G1.540.540.53
65.5%
Dried and weighed again, ONEJAW kept 81.5% of its starting mass after 30 minutes. One hard competitor kept 78%; the other three kept about half. Regular gums kept about a third, dried: between 33% and 37% of their starting mass, most of it gone in the first minute.
Read the wet columns with care: a piece weighed straight from the mouth carries saliva, so wet mass rises and falls. The dried mass is the number to keep. Chewing force differs from person to person, which is why one chewer took all three pieces of a gum, with the replicates spaced over days to keep the jaw fresh.